Skip to content
Work Practice Products Coding interviews Machine learning coding Quant developer HFT course Blog Method Why me About Enquire Book a call

Blog · Quant interviews

Mental maths for trading interviews: how to get faster

People who are fast at arithmetic are not computing faster than you. They are computing less. Almost every gain comes from turning the question into an easier one before you start.


An arithmetic screen at a market maker gives you about six seconds a question. That is not enough time to multiply two two-digit numbers the way school taught you, carrying digits in your head, and it is not meant to be. What the screen rewards is a small set of rewrites, practised until you no longer choose them, and the discipline to leave a question alone when you are not sure. The formats themselves are described on our mental maths tests page. This article is about the technique.

Round, then correct

The most useful habit is to move one number to something round and pay back the difference. 49 × 38 is 50 × 38 − 38, which is 1900 − 38 = 1862. 198 × 7 is 1400 − 14 = 1386. The correction is always small and easy, and the round product is one you know.

The same move works for addition and subtraction. 373 + 57 is 373 + 60 − 3 = 430. 1000 − 287 is 713: subtract each digit from 9 and the last from 10. Doing these the long way costs little each time, but a test has eighty of them.

Split the number you multiply by

When neither number is near a round one, break the smaller into tens and units. 34 × 27 is 30 × 27 + 4 × 27, which is 810 + 108 = 918. Two easy products and one addition, held in your head without any carrying. Multiplying by 5 is halving and multiplying by 10: 48 × 5 = 240. Multiplying by 25 is dividing by 4 and multiplying by 100.

Percentages break the same way. 18% of 350 is 10% (35) plus 8% (28), which is 63. And a percentage can be swapped with its base: 8% of 25 is the same as 25% of 8, which is 2.

Squares, and products that are secretly squares

Learn the squares to 30 by heart, then use them for everything nearby. 47² is (50 − 3)², which is 2500 − 300 + 9 = 2209. A number ending in 5 squares by multiplying the tens digit by the next number up and writing 25 after it: 65² is 6 × 7 = 42, so 4225; 85² is 7225.

Two numbers the same distance either side of a round one multiply as a difference of squares. 53 × 47 is 50² − 3² = 2491. 98 × 102 is 9996. Interviewers like these because they look like hard multiplications and take two seconds once you see them.

Fractions you should not be working out

Most of the decimals and fractions in these tests are a few families, and memorising them is quicker than any method of division. The ones worth knowing cold:

FamilyValuesThe pattern
Eighths1/8 = 0.125, 3/8 = 0.375, 5/8 = 0.625, 7/8 = 0.875Steps of 0.125
Sixteenths1/16 = 0.0625, 3/16 = 0.1875Half an eighth
Sevenths1/7 = 0.142857, 3/7 = 0.428571The same six digits, starting in a different place
Ninths4/9 = 0.444…The numerator repeated
Elevenths5/11 = 0.4545…Nine times the numerator, repeated: 45
Twelfths1/12 = 0.0833…, 5/12 = 0.4166…A third of a quarter

Anything over 99 or 33 becomes a repeating decimal at a glance. 37/33 is 1 + 4/33, and 4/33 is 12/99, so the answer is 1.1212… An improper fraction is a whole number plus one of the families above: 17/8 is 2 + 1/8 = 2.125.

Divide by the factors, not the number

Long division in your head is slow because you have to hold the remainder. Dividing by factors avoids it. 3108 ÷ 12 is 3108 ÷ 4 ÷ 3, which is 777 ÷ 3 = 259. A missing-number question such as 66 × ? = 138.6 is a division in disguise: 138.6 ÷ 66 is 2.1, because 66 × 2 = 132 and the 6.6 left over is a tenth of 66.

Check without redoing the sum

In a multiple-choice test the options often differ by more than the likely error, so a rough check is enough. Check the size first: 0.37 × 0.42 is a bit under 0.4 × 0.4 = 0.16, so 0.1554 is plausible and 1.554 is not. Check the last digit: 34 × 27 must end in 8, because 4 × 7 does.

When two options share both, add up the digits. A number leaves the same remainder on division by 9 as the sum of its digits, and products keep those remainders. For 34 × 27: 3 + 4 = 7 and 2 + 7 = 9, so the product must be a multiple of 9. 918 is (9 + 1 + 8 = 18); 928 is not.

When to skip

Under +1 for a right answer and −1 for a wrong one, a guess that is right with probability p is worth p − (1 − p) = 2p − 1 points. That is positive only above one half. With four options, a blind guess costs half a point on average, and ruling out two options only brings you to zero. So guessing helps only when you have a real lean, typically from the size or the last digit, and the six seconds are better spent on the next question.

The same logic sets your pace. A question that has taken eight seconds without an answer is unlikely to come out in the next two. Candidates who score well are usually not the ones who answered most; they are the ones who did not throw away points on the questions they could not finish.

How to practise

Ten minutes a day for four weeks does more than an hour the night before, because the point is to stop choosing a method and simply see it. Three rules make the practice count:

Our timed tests report accuracy and pace by question type, weakest first, which is the log built for you. For individual questions with worked answers, use the mental arithmetic bank.

Questions people ask

Can mental maths really be learned, or is it talent?

It is mostly learned. The people who seem to have a gift have usually absorbed the rewrites above so early that they no longer notice them. A few weeks of daily practice moves most candidates from not finishing half the test to finishing most of it.

Is Zetamac a good way to practise?

For raw speed, yes: its default game is two minutes of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division with small numbers. It does not test decimals, fractions or percentages, and it has no wrong answers to avoid, so use it alongside a test in the real format rather than instead of one. Target scores circulate on forums; none of them comes from a firm.

Do research and developer roles test mental arithmetic?

Less often, and rarely as a timed screen. Trading roles at market makers are where the screens are common. Research interviews still expect quick estimates during a problem, such as the size of a probability or a square root to one decimal place, so the habits above are worth having for any quant interview.

How fast do I need to be?

No firm publishes a pass mark. What candidates describe is that few people finish an 80 in 8, and that accuracy matters as much as the number attempted, because of the negative marking. A useful target is to answer at a steady six seconds a question with almost no errors, and to skip rather than guess.

PDF · Edition 2 · £79

The Quant Careers Report

The arithmetic screen opens the process at several market makers. The report sets out what each of 13 firms does after it, the pay they state and when to apply.

Buy the report — £79 See what is inside


Read next

LinkedIn X Facebook WhatsApp Telegram Email